Blog Spot



When you go to bed at night, do you feel more protected knowing Barney Frank Is watching over you? The thought kinda' creeps you out,huh?  If it doesn't, you're a very disturbed individual. The movie, "Nightmare on Barney Street", started when the headline grabbing chairman of the House Financial Services Committee decided to pander to...I mean protect you, the public, from being harmed by the banks.

Among many of the stifling, ill-informed things Barney &Co. came up with was a new Good Faith Estimate for your home loan. In the words of Tony The Tiger," THEY'RE GRRREEEEEATTT!!"
'Well except they weren't. You see in a rush to save you from a dubious financial death, 'Ole Barn overlooked a few things....like taking an estimate that was previously a single page of costs that very few people looked at,to turning it into a 3 or 4(depending on what incomprehensible rule your bank must now abide by) estimate that a borrower has no chance of understanding even if they wanted to.

Here's the second teenie-tiny oversight. 'See the star of our movie went to all this trouble to save you, and forgot one thing on the form....A place for you to sign showing you were ever given the document in the first place...OOPPPPPSSSSS!!!!

Below is an article from today's Los Angeles Times. Please have a look. And I hope you enjoyed the  premier of Nightmare on Barney Street.


By Kenneth R. Harney

May 8, 2011

Reporting from Washington—

What if the federal government spent years designing a tool to help consumers shop intelligently for mortgages — comparing lenders' rates, terms and total settlement costs — but consumers ignored it or didn't use it?

No need to speculate here; it appears to have already happened. A new survey of 1,000 U.S. consumers suggests that the good-faith estimate (GFE) disclosures that all home buyers and refinancers receive at loan application to facilitate shopping are not getting the job done.

Federally mandated good-faith estimates spell out the lender's charges, all anticipated fees for title insurance, escrow and settlement services, plus other key costs. The most recent version of the GFE, released at the beginning of last year, contains space for consumers to take one lender's estimates and get competing quotes from as many as three others. It also requires lenders to stand behind their estimates — guaranteeing that some of them won't increase by even a penny at closing, and others won't increase more than 10%.

But the survey found that the GFE may not be improving shopping as intended. After receiving the disclosure, 56% of buyers say they did no comparison shopping among other lenders. Another 12% used the form to contact just one additional lender, and 10% weren't sure whether they actually used the GFE at all. Just 3% said they comparison-shopped rates and terms at four lenders or more.

The survey, conducted by market research firm TNS Global for mortgage lender ING Direct, also found that 53% of those buyers who looked at the GFE spent less than 30 minutes doing so. Twenty-six percent either never looked at it or don't know whether they looked at it. Forty-nine percent of buyers said the GFE disclosure was too complicated, "a waste of time" or they weren't sure. Just 37% rated it "useful." The survey had a statistical margin of error of plus or minus 3.2%.

Arkadi Kuhlmann, chief executive of ING Direct, called the GFE potentially "one of the most crucial documents" a home buyer receives, yet the survey indicates that it is not effective. "If it's too complicated and not being used to help homeowners find the right mortgage for them," he said, "then [it's] just a waste of three pieces of paper."

Kuhlmann's firm, which does most of its mortgage business online, directs its customers to an educational website it has created at http://www.ingdirect.com/clearorange that walks them through the GFE step by step, explaining the process in terms that are easy to understand.

Between 2003 and 2008, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed modifications to the GFE, but critics said the revised disclosure was too lengthy — three pages — and predicted that it would become just another part of the paper blitz that cascades over buyers and mortgage applicants.

Kurt Pfotenhauer, chief executive of the American Land Title Assn., said if the revised "GFE were a rocket, it would still be sitting on the launch pad. Not only has it failed to simplify consumer shopping, there is evidence that [it] is actually confusing shoppers."

Phillip L. Schulman, a Washington lawyer who represents mortgage lenders and banks, said the survey results "are not surprising" because the disclosure looks complicated and "doesn't tell buyers what they really want to know: How much they're going to pay per month" from a given lender, with all expenses factored into a bottom-line number.

But Brian D. Montgomery, who was federal housing commissioner during the final years of drafting the revised GFE, said: "We believed that making shopping easier would be a benefit because there had been very little real shopping before. But obviously we didn't have a magic wand" that would change consumers' traditional behavior overnight.

Meanwhile, Congress has shifted responsibility for GFEs and other consumer mortgage disclosure issues to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is scheduled to spring to life in July. The bureau has announced that streamlining the GFE and combining it with federal truth-in-lending disclosures will be a priority.

Still, given the glacial pace of federal rulemaking, the three-page GFE is likely to remain in use for many months — maybe a year or more — before any new streamlined version takes its place. So here's a smart action plan for you as a consumer. If you seriously want to shop intelligently for a home loan, buck the popular trend: Read your GFE. And use it to compare costs — line item by line item — among multiple lenders.

kenharney@earthlink.net

Distributed by Washington Post Writers Group.

Pat Palmer-Realtor/Broker
Real Estate The Right Way
Looking For A Change? Click On Our Career Page Here

Posted by Forefront Real Estate-Pat Palmer on May 8th, 2011 6:46 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Forefront Real Estate
Phone: (909)-581-6018 Fax: (909)-912-8002 E-mail: email us here
  3175-E Sedona Court, Ontario, CA 91764

Lic Thru CA DRE # 01523595

  Home| Search MLS |Why Choose Us |Code Of Ethics | Our Featured Homes
 Careers With Forefront| Staff Profiles | Tell a Friend |  Contact Us | Home Price Index | Site Map 

 

Copyright © 2012 Forefront Real Estate
Portions Copyright © 2012 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Terms of UseSite Map
All rate, payment, and area information are estimates and approximations only.